Kering SA Earnings Call Transcript

Back to all transcripts

Kering SA (OTCPK:PPRUF) Q1 2024 Earnings Conference Call April 23, 2024 9:30 PM ET

Company Participants

Armelle Poulou - Chief Financial Officer
Claire Roblet - Director of Financial Communications and Market Intelligence

Conference Call Participants

Aurelie Husson-Dumoutier - HSBC
Antoine Belge - BNP Paribas Exane
Louise Singlehurst - Goldman Sachs
Edouard Aubin - Morgan Stanley
Thomas Chauvet - Citi
Oliver Chen - TD Cowen
David Da Maia - CIC Market Solutions
Piral Dadhania - RBC Capital Markets
Carole Madjo - Barclays
Charles-Louis Scotti - Kepler Cheuvreux
Rogerio Fujimori - Stifel

Armelle Poulou

Good evening to all of you, and welcome to Kering's Revenue Call for the First Quarter of 2024. Let's start on Slide 4. As we pre-announced last month, Kering had a revenue of €4.5 billion in the quarter, down 11% reported and 10% comparable. The bridge between comparable and reported revenue includes a 2 percentage point positive scope impact from Creed's consolidation and a 3 percentage point negative from FX.

Our Q1 performance reflects the well-flagged normalization of the growth in our sector, amplified by our own long-term strategic decision to elevate our houses, notably in terms of distribution as we scale down wholesale. We told you that we were expecting a year of two halves, with growth back-end loaded as the start of the year has obviously been far softer than we had anticipated, especially at Gucci.

Retail trends were affected by weak in-store traffic across our houses and across main regions apart from Japan. The drop in wholesale for its part, reflects both the rationalization strategy and this channel's difficulties in the U.S. By region, retail trends in Western Europe, North America and Japan turned out to be pretty much in line with Q4 as we had commented during our earnings call in February.

In Asia Pacific, on a more demanding comp base, market conditions proved challenging and volatile with differences across brands. In this environment, we remained focused on the implementation of our long-term strategy and prioritize the investments in our houses to nurture desirability and exclusivity.

Turning to Slide 5, a quick review of the breakdown of revenue by segment and region. Both Saint Laurent and the Other Houses posted a 6% comparable decline in the quarter. Bottega Veneta and the Kering Eyewear & Corporate segment were up to a 9% comparable, respectively.

Taking these four segments together, the revenue was down 2% comparable, very much in line with the trend in Q4 last year, even a touch better. Conversely, Gucci had a very challenging quarter, down 18% comparable. At group level, all regions gained share in our revenue mix at the expense of Asia Pacific, whose weight dropped to 34% of the total.

On Slide 6, let's move to revenue by channel and region. Retail accounted for 74% of the total as the consolidation of Creed and the steady growth of Kering Eyewear, both predominantly wholesale businesses, led to a slight decrease of retail in the revenue mix. In the quarter, retail declined 11% comparable on a broadly stable store network, with only 10 net units added, which slightly reduced its store counts.

In Western Europe, retail was down 9%. Neither local demand, no tourism spending was supportive, although there were clear construct by brand and countries. North America remained in negative territory, down 11%, here also with diverging trends across brands and price positioning, the higher-end segment performing somewhat better.

Japan was up 16%. The market is propelled by strong tourist spending from China and other Asian countries, which represented 39% of revenue in Q1. To counter the persisting weakness of the yen, our houses implemented some price increases, but tourists can still take advantage of the attractive price differential.

Asia Pacific declined 19%, mostly driven by Greater China. [Korea] was still negative but showed signs of improvement on an undemanding comp base. The Chinese cluster spend close to 28% outside of its domestic market in the quarter. About 4/5 of the spending remain in Asia, including Japan.

The increase in overseas spending was not enough to offset the domestic drop, and revenue from the cluster was down close to 20% in again with significant disparities across brands. And finally, Rest of the World was up 6%, driven by the Middle East.

Wholesale and other revenue was down 7% comparable in dynamics you are familiar with. As we had anticipated, wholesale revenue from our luxury houses dropped 20%. This was mitigated by very solid performances at Kering Eyewear and in royalties up 8% and 16%, respectively.

Let's now review our houses, starting with Gucci on Slide 7. Q1 revenue was down 21% reported and 18% comparable. Retail was down 19%. The bulk of the decrease stemmed from weak traffic, with the main drag coming from Asia Pacific. To a lesser extent, average ticket impacted by the regional and product mix also contributed to the decline. By product category, the decline was more pronounced in leather goods, while ready-to-wear, especially women's, was up in all regions but Asia Pacific.

The introduction of the new collections, starting with early pieces from the fashion show and followed by additional developments, was ramped up in selected stores according to plan from mid-February on, then gradually expanded to a broader network from March onwards. On average, new collections represented less than 7% of sales in the quarter.

Market reception was very encouraging. From the new iteration of the Jackie handbag to the [Signoria] line, as well as the [Re-Web] model in shoes. In women's ready-to-wear, emblematic designs in outwear, nightwear and coats sold well.

Introduction of newness is instrumental to generate interest and nurture brand desirability. It will allow to fuel carryover sales in the short-term and more importantly, enrich the offer and build future growth pillars over time.

The debut of Ancora was marked by a host of communication initiatives, clienteling and in-store activation across region. Gucci also continued to invest in campaigns on iconic products from the Horsebit 1953 loafer to the [indiscernible] with fresh luggage size providing impetus for a new wave of visions.

Let's take a look at the rest of the group, which had a rather resilient quarter overall, starting with Saint Laurent on Slide 8. The house's comparable sales were 6% lower. Retail was down less than 4% against a very solid Q1 last year. Sales were stable in Western Europe and up slightly in Japan on booming demand from tourists. In North America, the relative withdrawal of aspirational customers continued to weigh on Saint Laurent's performance. In all these regions, trends improved sequentially.

Asia, starting with Greater China, was impacted by depressed traffic and the challenging business environment. Across all markets, Saint Laurent affirmation of its legitimacy with high-end customers continues to make progress. The house is deepening relationships with existing clients and recruiting new customers to the brand through targeted retail strategies. Shoes and leather goods proved resistant, notably thanks to the success of new collections.

Wholesale was down 25%. In addition to implementing our strategy, we remain particularly selective when it comes to U.S. partners. In the coming quarters, Saint Laurent will work on enriching its offering across all price points, broadening the appeal of its men's line and further enhancing quality, particularly in leather goods. A new website, ad campaigns and high visibility at The Cannes Film Festival should all support the house image and positioning.

Turning to Slide 9. Bottega Veneta delivered a very good performance in the quarter, particularly in its stores. Retail revenue was up 9% in comparable terms. Women's handbags achieved strong double-digit growth. The house did exceptionally well in North America and the Middle East, boosted by local clients, while tourists supported growth in Western Europe, and the Asia Pacific region was resilient.

Bottega Veneta's appeal with high-spending clients, leveraging its high-end positioning, was reflected in a sharp increase in average ticket. Its conversion rate was also up in the quarter.

The house Winter 24 collection presented in late February, received wide acclaim and was ranked among the season's top shows by the leading fashion authority. During the quarter, Bottega Veneta opened its new store in the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele Wholesale was down 25% in the quarter as we continue to implement our selective strategy.

All in all, Bottega's solid performance confirms the success of an elevation strategy we are carefully nurturing and executing over time. The house's strong momentum since the beginning of the year should be extended in the coming quarters, fueled by major initiatives to establish its presence and visibility for the long-term, notably in the all-important China market.

On Slide 10, a summary of the performance of the other houses. In total, revenue was down 7% reporting and 6% comparable, dragged down by wholesale down 25%. Retail posted 3% comparable growth.

Starting with our soft luxury houses, Balenciaga retail trends improved sequentially in Western Europe and Japan, while North America recovered up double digits on easy comps. In Asia Pacific, the house showed good resilience. Balenciaga enjoyed solid momentum in ready-to-wear and successfully launched Rodeo, a new handbag line in the higher-end segment. The Oscar ceremony provided the opportunity for Balenciaga to showcase its rich heritage and know-how, creating an original goal from 1951 as you see on this picture.

At Alexander McQueen, the highlight of the quarter was a new brand campaign, followed by the inaugural show of the new creative direction. Initial products will progressively hit the stores through drops starting from July. Leveraging these changes, Kering decided to initiate an in-depth organizational review and reset at Alexander McQueen.

Brioni posted very healthy growth across regions, driven by both bespoke services and leisurewear. For jewelry, it's another quarter of double-digit growth. The performance of Boucheron stands out, especially in Japan and Asia Pacific. Growth was fueled by its iconic jewelry lines, Quatre, celebrating its 20th anniversary, as well as [indiscernible]. Pomellato enjoyed robust momentum in retail, also driven by Japan and Asia Pacific. Very recently, the brand launched Pom Pom Dot, a colorful reversible collection. And finally, Qeelin continued to strengthen its presence in its domestic market and in Japan with the opening of four stores.

Let's conclude this review with Kering Eyewear & Corporate on Slide 11. Revenue was €536 million, up 24% reported and 9% comparable. Kering Eyewear's revenue stood at €463 million, up 8% comparable, a strong start to the year across key brands in both optical and sunglass frames. Europe and Asia Pacific were the main regions contributing to the performance. An important focus was put on Maui Jim, with investments in branding together with a global communication campaign and the launch of a new collection.

Kering Beauté benefited from Creed's consolidation, which posted a performance in line with our plans, thanks to both iconic bestsellers and its most recent launches. After the success of Carmina launched last year, Creed added a new line to its feminine fragrance offer, Queen of Silk, whose global rollout will take place in the second quarter. The teams are readying the introduction of Bottega Veneta's first fragrance, scheduled in the second half.

Before getting to the question-and-answer session, I would like to reiterate the determination and commitment of every one of us to overcome the current challenges and build the condition for sustainable growth. We knew 2024 was not going to be an easy year under the best of circumstances. For reason that have largely to do with the China market and with the strategic realignment of our houses, the first half of the year is already proving even tougher than we expected.

Regardless of the environment, we have decided to continue investing in our brands, but we are even more selective, even more demanding when it comes to assessing the return on every investment we make in products, in stores, in communications. This being said, while we are ready to take far-reaching initiatives, we will not compromise with the protection and development of our brands for the long-term and their ability to rebound, even if it entails short-term pain.

As a result, operating deleverage and our continuing investments, even conducted cautiously and intelligently, will definitely impact our full-year EBIT at a time where our topline is under pressure. At the year-end, we had indicated that we expected the EBIT decline to be particularly marked in the first half. As you have seen in the release, on the basis of topline trends, we estimate that the year-on-year EBIT decline in the first half could be in a range of 40% to 45%.

And now, Claire and I are ready to take your questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question is from Aurelie Husson-Dumoutier of HSBC. Please go ahead.

Aurelie Husson-Dumoutier

Yes. Thank you very much. Good evening, everyone. I have three questions, please, all on Gucci. The first one is, could you come back on the phasing of the new collection being displayed in stores from the 7% that you mentioned in Q1? And is the return to growth as of Q3, which is what the consensus currently expects, realistic, considering this phasing? My second question is still on the growth at Gucci. What do you think of the minus 6% organic that the consensus expects for Gucci in full-year 2024?

And my last question is on margin. If my calculations are correct, you expect an operating margin of circa 24% to 25% for Gucci in H1? And my question relates to H2 and whether we can keep the assumption of 30% that you initially had for full-year 2024, assuming a modest phase growth. It is just to make sure that we are all on the same page when it comes to H2? Thank you very much.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Aurelie, for your question. So I'm first going to answer on your question on the ramp-up of Sabato's summer collection. So as you know, it's a gradual [indiscernible] up of the new collection. It has started as planned in Q1, and it will continue in Q2 with additional pieces from the fashion show collections and early deliveries of the main collections that will allow to offer a wider range of assortments and also more for men's. In Q2, the new collection should move from around 20% in April to slightly more than 30% in June. So all-in-all, it should make an average of 25% of sales in Q2. And by Q3, Q4, offers in store will be all designed by Sabato De Sarno.

For your second question – yes. So maybe I'm going to answer your second question, which is about Q3. As we said, we are expecting better trends in H2 than in H1.

Regarding your third question on margin on Gucci, I will probably answer more largely on the group and – so you're asking for H2. So maybe as you know, we are expecting better trends in H1 and in H2. We are just – we have just announced how we are expecting the EBIT to be in H1. At group level, we expect to improve the EBIT margin sequentially in H2 versus H1 in a range of 100 to 150 basis points.

Aurelie Husson-Dumoutier

Thank you. That's very clear. Maybe on the second question and on the fact that I was asking on what do you think of the minus 6% organic growth that the consensus expects for the full-year and whether you feel it's maybe a bit too pessimistic, do you have any comment on that?

Claire Roblet

Hello, Aurelie, it's Claire. I mean, we don't really comment that much on consensus. I think you – we start from the base in Q1. To be honest, I'm sure there are going to be some questions about current trading in Q2, but I think it's already fair to say that we don't assume much better trends in Q2 so far. So to make a minus 6% for the full-year, it's pretty stretched.

Aurelie Husson-Dumoutier

Okay. Thank you very much.

Operator

The next question is from Antoine Belge of BNP Paribas Exane. Please go ahead.

Antoine Belge

Yes. Hello. Good evening. It's Antoine at BNP. Three questions. I'd like to come back on this motion of the ramp-up. When you mentioned that from Q3, all products will be from Sabato, can you confirm that it's 100% of the newness? And if I'm not wrong with the newness, it is like 1/3 of the offering. And so could you elaborate a little bit on the back because I think you mentioned that the initial feedback on products were more on ready-to-wear and shoes? So yes, how is Sabato more going to influence bags? Because if I'm not mistaken, he didn't – bags like the [indiscernible] or Jackie, it's more about reinterpreting them than relaunching a new one?

My second question relates to the margin in H1. So I understand you rather comment on the group rather than Gucci, you mentioned deleverage. But should we assume quite a significant hit on the gross margin as well? I think there is like a 100 bps impact from foreign currencies. And I would assume that by now, there should be also some either inventory write-downs or impact from markdowns from products going into your outlets?

On the final question, as you – as Claire nicely offered to provide some figure on current trading, is it – I understood that maybe on Gucci, there was no big improvement, but maybe can we have a comment on other brands? So maybe a sort of outlook by nationality, which one maybe started the second quarter a bit better and the one maybe deteriorating? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Antoine. So on your first point, yes, I confirm that when I'm talking about the ramp-up of Sabato's selection, I'm talking about the newness. You're right, the newness is about 1/3 of the offer. On your second question on handbags, it's true that the first drop of Sabato De Sarno was mostly in ready-to-wear and shoes. And handbags are going to progressively go and complete the offer even if the Jackie Notte has had a good reception and actually help also sustain the sales of the Jackie in general.

Regarding handbags, we are working on some new introduction progressively that will come in the offer. It's very important that we introduce newness because it's part of the attraction that is helping traffic in the stores. It's also going to be in the long-term what is going to help the growth of the brand by building the future pillar, of course, by – with new introduction.

In the short-term, in order to leverage on the new creativity momentum, we are, of course, progressively extending the offer in newness with essential products and [sizes] that are immediately attributable to the new aesthetic, and we will distribute them to a broader network. We are also working in the short-term on the handbag strategy to quickly refresh the offer, leveraging on novelties to generate interest and traffic, as I was saying, in the store.

About inventory, yes, you had a question on the level – inventory and the gross margin. Okay. I take the inventory and then I answer to you on the gross margin. On inventory, that's an area where we've done a lot of efforts recently in managing better the planning, the open to buy and the supply chain in general, and we've been very cautious also with our objective of sell-through.

And we are quite happy with the level of inventory at Gucci because the number of units is lower than the one we had in December. And we don't feel that we are getting – we are very cautious and very effective in the way we manage inventory, inventory being the result of all the process in the supply chain.

Regarding margins, margins, we had commented margins during the February call. Regarding gross margin, the comments quite remain the same. We are – as you know, we are increasing the quality of the products. We are doing some cleaning action in inventory. And as you mentioned, they can be – the effect of hedging will be less positive than last year. So all in all, all those elements may weigh on the gross margin. And we confirm with an effect on the gross margin of 50 basis points, as we mentioned already in February, for the group.

Then you had the last question on the current trading. On current trading, we don't usually comment on current trading, but still, first thing is, as you know, the comp base is not easy because you have the Easter this year that is a week earlier and the Ramadan that achieved 10 days.

But to give you an idea, retail at group level is roughly in line with March trends. And March was a bit below the Q1 performance, but not materially. If we look at it by region, we don't see any change in trends in APAC, including Mainland China, which continues to face a difficult comp base in April. Japan keeps performing very well, in line with Q1. For Western Europe and North America, it's a bit difficult to comment with volatility from one week to the other.

Antoine Belge

Okay. Just maybe a quick follow-up. So if the – in H1, at least, for the group, is the – actually, there is not much more negative impact at gross margin. So it's pure deleverage with no intention on your side maybe to be cutting A&P that much?

Armelle Poulou

Yes, our intention is to sustain the investment that we feel are very important for our brands in A&P, for instance. At the same time, conscious of the current context, we are very careful and cautious in the way we spend and we monitor our OpEx. So I'm talking at group level. But at group level, our OpEx increase this year should be around mid-single digit.

Antoine Belge

Okay. Thank you very much.

Operator

The next question is from Chiara Battistini of JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Ms. Battistini, your line is open, I think you are muted. Please go ahead. Ms. Battistini, we cannot hear you. Can you unmute your line please?

Claire Roblet

Maybe we'll move on to the next question, and we take Chiara afterwards?

Operator

The next question is from Louise Singlehurst of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Louise Singlehurst

Hi. Good afternoon. [Indiscernible] I'll stick to two, and I'll cheekily jump in ahead of Chiara on that one. I wonder if we could just take a step back on what's going on at Gucci. Obviously, we've got the new product coming in from Mr. De Sarno. We knew and we always knew it would be a slow buildup in terms of the proportion of the offer that comes through, which is new. But can you just talk about if there are any signs of improvement of traffic or interest coming back to the core Gucci lines? Or is it just too early?

And then my second question is related to the stores and whether you have plans for a bigger refurbishment program. Is it that the new content is coming in, but the stores still look quite similar to the consumer as we had before? I wonder if you can just tell us a little bit about what you're seeing in terms of traffic or interest in the new product? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Louise, for your questions. On your first question, it's true that we have experienced low traffic across the board and especially in Asia, which I think is something that happened across the Luxury segment, but it was much more true in Asia. Yes, we were anticipating the gradual ramp-up of Sabato De Sarno.

I think what is important to mention is that the performance of carryover suffered from the weak in-store traffic, but also probably from an offer that needs to be enriched and rejuvenated. This is mostly true in the handbag category and to some extent, in shoes. The carryover catalog has already been revised and cleaned to streamline the long tail of lower size but – and we have further enriched the new style. Now in the short-term, we are working on accelerating some introduction to refresh the offer. At the same time, we hope also that having more newness in the store will also help traffic and sustain also the carryover at the same time.

Louise Singlehurst

Can I just ask in terms of personnel changes? Obviously, there's been a huge amount of change over the past few months. But in terms of like the merchandising team, product development, is everyone in place now? Or is there still a hiring program going forward?

Armelle Poulou

As you know, we are glad to welcome Stefano Cantino to Gucci's team. So this – he's going to join the Gucci in May and is going – his focus is going to be on the communication, the product and marketing and work closely with the communications, the merchandising team and the design team.

Louise Singlehurst

Thank you.

Claire Roblet

And maybe, Louise, I'll take your question on the store network. So we don't have a new store concept for now. There is an ongoing beauty contest with some architects to find the best concept, and there will not be really a new concept, which will be obviously a brand concept or not before end of next year or even early 2026. So in the meantime, what we are – what Gucci is doing is to upgrade the existing stores. We take the opportunity of natural, I would say, refurb, which we have to do in any case, every seven to eight years to refurb. And the concept you have in Monte Napoleone in New Bond Street, you will see it more and more in other stores.

Now, do we need to have new stores when you have new products? I would say yes and no. You remember, obviously, that when Alexander McQueen collection were hitting the shelf, most of the stores were still under the previous concept, the name [Frida] concept, and it didn't prevent the product from working out extremely well. So yes, it's better to have consistency. But at the same time, there is a natural, I would say, refurb program, which already will upgrade the network.

Louise Singlehurst

Thank you.

Operator

The next question is from Edouard Aubin of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Edouard Aubin

Yes. Good afternoon. Just sorry to continue on Gucci, apologies, not obviously a key focus. Armelle, in terms of the operating leverage and the store rationalization, so back of the envelope, it looks like your sales density would have gone down by about 30% between your peak of 2019 and this year. So obviously, a very negative scissor effect, which obviously is impacting your profitability, as you mentioned. So the number of points of sales has increased quite a bit at the banner, at the brand over the past five years more than some of your kind of direct peers. So is the solution simply just to increase sales in order to increase sales density? Or could you proceed to some rationalization of your store estate? I think you mentioned in your prepared remarks that a number of stores was flat to down in Q1. So that's question number one.

Question number two, sorry, but just to follow-up on the inventory at the group level and at Gucci. I think that's quite important. So I get the point that you made, again, as you had made in February that in terms of units, the number of – the inventories are down, while they are up in value. But in value terms, we calculate the number of inventory days has kind of doubled to 360 days over the past eight years, so it is much more than some of your peers. So there are also reports about some of your brands discounting either at wholesale or greater presence in outlets. So again, if you could just reiterate, sorry to come back on this topic, but that you're okay with your inventory level and that you're not budgeting more gross margin pressure today than you anticipated at the beginning of the year?

And then just lastly, sorry, just to come back on the – on Gucci's margin. A few months or quarters ago, you had hinted – or management had hinted that [indiscernible] had identified a number of potential operational improvement to implement at Gucci. Are these implement real? Or is the fact that operating deleverage is just so severe that they cannot really offset any of the improvement you intend to make at Gucci? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Edouard. On your first question on the number of stores, I mean, we are not increasing the number of stores at the moment. But at the same time, we think it's very important that we have a good network and that we – this network is there for the future and for the long-term. So we are not expanding, but we are not going to close that many stores. Of course, the store network is always reconsidered, we are doing refurbishment, relocations, making sure we had exactly – it's a good location at any moment, but it's not a question of expanding or decreasing the space for Gucci.

Of course, the sales density is really a KPI that we are looking at, and that's – we know that it's a very important one for us, but it's not by closing store. We will – as we said, in the medium term, we'll close some outlets or some stores if we consider that they are not sufficiently exclusive or not in a place that is sufficiently exclusive. But this is part of our strategy to make sure that we have the best distribution and that we are raising the exclusivity of our distribution.

Your second question was on inventory? Yes. On inventories, yes, it depends on how you look at it. You're referring to 2019. It's true that the level of inventory over that period increased quite a lot. And this is why this is really a topic of focus in the company at the moment.

And as I was mentioning before, the first focus is really to make sure that we reengineer the way we plan, produce, transport and sell-through in order that at the end of the day, we have much less leftovers. And that's the work that is going on, and that is already proving – showing some very good sign of improvement.

Now for the stock that we have at the moment, as we said already in the past, of course, we are going to be gradual. Our strategy is to reduce, in a very important way, the number of outlets, going forward. At the same time, we are conscious of the situation at the moment, and it will be a gradual work in order to manage that issue the best way possible.

The last question was on operating deleverage at Gucci. Yes, as you mentioned, in a challenging environment for the topline in Q1, and we don't expect a very much different trend in Q2. There is in effect a strong operational deleverage of the – but for that, we are doing two things: First, we are – I think it's important, we are looking at our cost base in order to reduce any inefficiency that we have in the cost structure.

And at the same time, we don't want to compromise on some investment and spending that we think are very important for the rebound of Gucci. So it means that, yes, there will be some effort on OpEx, but not to a point that it's going to offset the operational deleverage quantity, and you know that.

Edouard Aubin

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

The next question is from Chiara Battistini of JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Ms. Battistini your line is open. Maybe your line is muted from your side.

Claire Roblet

Right. Well, we have to take Chiara when it works. I'm sorry. Can you move on to the next question?

Operator

The next question is from Thomas Chauvet of Citi. Please go ahead.

Thomas Chauvet

Good evening, Armelle and Claire. I have three questions, please. The first one on Gucci and the collection. Could you comment perhaps on any initial feedback, order book you've had so far on for Winter 2024 presented last February from your key wholesale partners. How do you think this collection, which was a bit different from Ancora, also would lead to improvements in brand heat and drive the store traffic you need?

Secondly, coming back to the group EBIT guidance. I'm looking at your press release, I just want to confirm, understand's correctly. So down 40%, 45% in the first half. And if I'm not mistaken, you're saying that it will be down about 15%, one, five, in the full-year, in line with last year's decline. So that would imply, if we just think in absolute values rather than margins, about €1.6 billion in the first half and €2.4 billion in the second half. And so I'm trying to understand that H2 outlook, that would be €2.4 billion, nearly up 20% year-on-year. It's quite above consensus expectations for the second half. I assume this...

Armelle Poulou

Thomas, I think, yes, no, it's not what we – I will come back on that point, okay?

Thomas Chauvet

Okay, so maybe I misunderstood, you can elaborate on that full-year guidance, then – I probably misread the release. And finally, perhaps just on capital allocation. Over the past years, you've invested a lot in various things, acquisitions with Creed and Beaute, the 30% stake in Valentino, some key real estate acquisitions in New York, Paris, Milan. Is it fair to consider you might want to markup those now to preserve the balance sheet, particularly in a year of cash flow pressure like this year? And the press was commenting on Kering being one of the most suited candidate for Marcolin in eyewear. I mean, is it an asset that you have interest in? Thank you.

Claire Roblet

Hello, Thomas. Yes, I'll take the first question. So first, on order book and wholesale, it's clear we have not delivered the collection to wholesale partners. So it's exclusive to our stores. It has been a gradual ramp-up in terms of number of products, in terms of number of stores. So I mean that's a strong reception from the client. We had some products from Ancora.

And remember, it's a fashion show. So it's mostly quite high-end, sophisticated pieces in ready-to-wear, in shoes. And gradually in Q2, you will have more of the what's called the main collection coming; so broader assortment, more stores, and that's explaining the ramp-up. So I think Q2 is going to be a better, I would say, quarter to have more feedback about the reception of the new collection.

Thomas Chauvet

Maybe it's too early to talk about talk about...

Claire Roblet

It's too early for now. And in the case, once again, the collection will not be delivered to wholesale partners, it's going to remain exclusive mostly to our stores. So I cannot comment on order book, et cetera. You will have – retail will be the one that will give the trend. And for that, we have to have a gradual ramp-up of the collection in stores to provide with more feedback.

Thomas Chauvet

And the fact you're not delivering [indiscernible] for Gucci, which is down 7%...

Claire Roblet

It's just because this collection was – once again, the first, call it, part of the collection was very high end and more sophisticated product. So that's not what we can deliver to wholesale. And then gradually, obviously, when we have a broader, more commercial pieces, et cetera, we will work, but we will be extremely selective with the wholesale partners. And once again, it's going to be – the wholesale now is pretty limited in any case. So it's going to be really the retail that will be the good KPI to judge.

Thomas Chauvet

Understood. Thanks.

Armelle Poulou

So, let me answer on the margin and the EBIT for the full-year. I'm going to try to be clear. So first thing, maybe what we see is that we are not seeing any inflation in trends for Q2. So if we meant to – if we want to remain cautious, we anticipate that Q2 should not improve substantially compared to Q1. That's the first thing.

And then as we always said, we are more confident for H2, both thanks to [indiscernible] but also brand-specific momentum and ramp-up of collections. So we expect H2 to be, on the topline, more positive than H1.

What we said is that the effect we had on the EBIT in H1 in terms of gross margin, which is 50 basis points, should stay the same in the second half. For the fiscal year, there are still a lot of uncertainties, so it's not easy to forecast precisely what's going to happen for the full-year, especially in H2. We are quite early in the year. There are a lot of initiatives that are ongoing, both on revenue and cost optimization. However, we are working to improve EBIT margin sequentially in H2 versus H1 in a range from 100 to 150 basis points. Regarding OpEx, OpEx should increase around mid-single-digit.

Thomas Chauvet

Okay. Maybe if I just come back to the press release to make sure I understood, and I talk in absolute values. In the release, it says in 2024, the impact of Kering investment strategy will weigh on group recurring operating income, which should post a decline compared to the level reported in 2023. So that suggests you're sort of guiding for EBIT recurring [indiscernible]

Claire Roblet

Thomas, that was the full-year guidance, okay, that we mentioned already in the full-year, that we didn't change. The only thing that changed is that we included a comment on H1 by giving this range of year-over-year EBIT decline for H1.

Thomas Chauvet

I get that. But because H1 is [indiscernible] that implies a big rebound?

Claire Roblet

No. I don't see you mentioned – how do you get a big rebound in H2? Where do you read a big rebound in H2 in the outlook?

Thomas Chauvet

So we can say that I understood and [indiscernible]

Claire Roblet

We cannot hear you well, Thomas. Can you repeat? Sorry.

Thomas Chauvet

If I understand there release guiding now for now of €1.6 billion, half, which is 40%, 45% and down in line with last year's decline with the full-year, which is minus 15% last year[indiscernible]. So that implies about half?

Claire Roblet

I still don't get where you take your minus 15 from? Sorry.

Thomas Chauvet

Just from the press release.

Claire Roblet

On the press release?

Thomas Chauvet

On Page 3.

Claire Roblet

The press release – and I'm happy to follow up afterwards with the press release. But it's important, everyone has the same level of information. Press release just mentioned year-over-year EBIT decline, okay? And H1 minus 40% to minus 45%. Do we read the same outlook, yes? Yes, is it clearer?

Thomas Chauvet

Yes, it is.

Claire Roblet

Okay. Good.

Thomas Chauvet

Thank you. And just maybe on capital allocation and Marcolin?

Armelle Poulou

On capital allocation, Thomas, our focus short-term is organic growth, resuming topline momentum at Gucci and successfully develop our adjacent businesses, notably thanks to the integration of the recent acquisition at Creed, Maui Jim and LINDBERG. Now, our balance sheet is quite healthy and – with a low for incremental M&A. Regarding Marcolin, we never comment on future M&A, so I will not comment on that point.

Thomas Chauvet

Thank you.

Operator

The next question is from Oliver Chen of TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Oliver Chen

Hi, Armelle and Claire. The U.S. comments were helpful. You mentioned diverging trends in the higher-end segments doing better, as well as a fair bit of volatility. Would love your thoughts on the U.S. Was it worse or better than you expected? It sounds pretty bumpy, and the aspirational customer has been under pressure. And then as we think about Gucci, a short question is why was Asia Pac so much worse than other regions? Maybe this is not a short question.

And then as you think about newness and innovation. It sounds like you have opportunity for new product families. So what's on the horizon? And what would you focus on in terms of what you were speaking to with interjecting newness and rethinking – or thinking about the handbag and accessory collection? That would be helpful because you seem to allude to it a few times? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Oliver. On the U.S., yes, we've seen diverging trends by brands, with sequential improvement at Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta and Balenciaga, while Gucci did not improve. And Balenciaga, of course, helped by easier curves, but coming back to growth, which is good news.

We saw some very strong growth at Bottega Veneta. It's plus 25% in the quarter. And Saint Laurent being more resilient in Q1 than in Q4. It's true that the performance seems to be still dragged down by aspirational customers, with high-end consumers continuing to hold better. Also to be noted that we are starting to see better trends with younger customers in Q1.

Regarding your second question on Asia Pacific, I think that, as I said, there's been a huge drop in traffic in Asia Pacific across all our brands, with some responses a bit different from one brand to the next. It depends also on the journey of our brands. With – as you know, Balenciaga that is having some very encouraging results in Asia this quarter, but also the precedent quarter. Bottega Veneta making good progress, but we think still some potential to progress and Gucci suffering the most and Saint Laurent suffering also.

It's a question also in China, probably, as I said, the macroeconomic environment making attractive to customers, either the higher end, where it's like even they consider it as an investment, or probably some pressure on the consumer that is looking some more affordable products. Then – so that's how we read the Chinese market at the moment.

Oliver Chen

Okay. And on new platform, what should we think about...

Claire Roblet

Oliver, it's Claire. I'm sorry, we didn't completely get your question on newness. Can you repeat? Maybe the line is not so good.

Oliver Chen

Yes. Just what's happening with the new platform in introducing new collection? That seems like an opportunity.

Claire Roblet

Yes. I mean, well, you have the normal phasing of the show than the collection. So the show that was presented by Sabato and his team in January and Feb will make the bulk of the offer gradually by the end of Q2 and then Q3, Q4.

You will have the Cruise presentation that will be in May, that will be in London. So usually, the Cruise collection is introduced in stores, I would say, around November. What we are going to do probably is that in the handbags category, we're going to anticipate some of the launches a bit earlier. So you will have probably much more launches than in, I would say, a normative year, and that will happen in Q3 and maybe as early as, I would say, July.

So clearly, there is a speed-up in the process of rejuvenation of the carryover base by the introduction of I would say, quite a number of new lines that should occur quite ahead of a normal season. So you can – you will probably follow that, I would say, early Q3.

Oliver Chen

Okay. Last, Claire, on the price points, what – on the new lines, is there a characterization of what price here they'll be in? Or will it be at high and middle or entry?

Claire Roblet

Yes. I think they are working – we are working at Gucci in other directions. I mean, we need to have a balanced offer. So it means that we need to be – and Gucci needs to be relevant and is working to be relevant in all the different price segments. So some will be in the more higher end, more elevated part of the offer. But we also need to balance value and I would say it's some component of volume. So you will have also probably two at least, I would say, two lines that will be positioned in the more, what we call, midrange segment to really have good traction in all the different price points.

Oliver Chen

Okay. Last one, you expect traffic to still be negative in the back half, is that a fair expectation, just given the tough traffic trends at Gucci?

Claire Roblet

Should be still negative, when? Sorry.

Oliver Chen

In the second half, the traffic trends to continue to be negative throughout the year.

Claire Roblet

I don't have crystal ball, to be honest, on this one. So far, we don't really see traffic picking up. I mean, traffic has been really under pressure in Q1 across almost all regions, I would say, except Japan. So we'll see. I mean, we hope newness in stores will drive more traffic, obviously. Now it's not only about newness, it's also about the overall environment. Yes, let's hope that gradually, we see less pressure and even a recovery in traffic. But once again, it's difficult to make any forecast on this one.

Oliver Chen

Thank you very much. Thank you.

Claire Roblet

Thank you, Oliver.

Operator

The next question is from David Da Maia of CIC. Please go ahead.

David Da Maia

Hi. Good evening. Two questions for me, please. The first one on Gucci brand innovation strategy. So I think that Gucci clearly has the legacy to implement a brand elevation strategy because it's a very powerful brand. In this context, I was wondering how long are you getting prepared to, I would say, temporary reduce a significant share of your business you have built during the Michele era in order to regain, I would say, a more exclusive positioning and to finally attract a more high-end customer base? So in other words, would you be ready to temporarily reduce the size of Gucci in order to regain a more exclusive position and maybe increase the chances of success of the brand elevation strategy? So that's the first question.

And the second one, maybe on Balenciaga. The brand clearly seems to regain some momentum. Would you say that the ingoing creative refocusing and the recent stronger marketing push are now paying off, starting to bear some fruits in the Western markets? Especially in this context, do you think Balenciaga should be able to preserve its margin despite the negative impact from the ongoing wholesale rationalization? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, David. On your first question, yes, Gucci is executing its strategy. As you know, we are working on raising the desirability and the exclusivity of the brand. It goes with the aesthetics, but not only the product offer, the exclusivity of the distribution, the retail excellence in stores, the communication. What is important for us is – Gucci is a very strong brand. It's really to make sure that we are developing sales with quality in line with the strategy of desirability and exclusivity. So that's what we are aiming at, and we know it's going – probably it will take probably a few quarters. But it's important for us that we stay focused on developing growth with quality sales.

Regarding your – so this also goes with the fact that we are balancing the effort between the different segments of clientele, making sure that we are still – we are attractive to the more aspirational customer, fashion-driven customer, but also that we are very accretive to the high-end customer. And we are making some progress with the high-end customer, and that is very encouraging.

Your second question regards Balenciaga. And I think you talked about communication, is it paying off? What's at Balenciaga? The trend is quite encouraging because the retail trends improved sequentially. Retail growth was contrasted by region. Japan showed a consistent double-digit growth. North America is back to positive territories. Asia Pacific is very resilient if you look at the average of the market, and Western Europe is improving even if still in negative territory.

I think it's important to mention also that Balenciaga is consistently seeing some progress on the VIC segment. It's one of our brand that has the highest share of VIC. It's also important to mention that this quarter, Balenciaga launched a bag that is Rodeo. The Rodeo is a great success. It actually has been sold out in every region. It's a bag that is having a very good reception, and it's a very important success for the brand where we wanted to progress on the handbag category.

And then I would say in terms of communication, it's not only a question of spending. I think that, yes, we are back to communication at Balenciaga this year. And there's been a couple of events. I mentioned in my introductory remarks about the Oscar. But the communication of Balenciaga and the success of Balenciaga in communication were really good this quarter. In terms of margin for Balenciaga, the fact that we invest in the brand, especially in communication, is going to create, short-term, some operational deleverage, but we really think that's a good decision for the brand in the future.

David Da Maia

Thank you.

Operator

The next question is from Piral Dadhania of RBC. Please go ahead.

Piral Dadhania

Okay. Thank you. Good evening. I have three as well, please. The first one is on Gucci APAC. Just coming back to the outsized weakness in that region in Q1 and expectations for Q2 as well. if we could just drill down and perhaps try and get your perspective on whether you believe this is a product, a brand or a timing issue product because there is a lack of newness, a brand issue, which would be more structural, or a timing issue because the customers are a bit more fashion forward and waiting for the new Sabato product.

On the back of that, what is the feedback that you're receiving from your VIC customers in the Asia and, specifically, China region as well as the sales associates? What are you hearing on the ground in terms of the weakness in that business? And I guess, still associated with that, the plan that Laurent Cathala has put together for the China business at Gucci, is that still in play? Or does it require a change in strategy?

My second question just relates to the ramp-up of new Sabato product over the next, I guess, one to two years. Thank you for providing the ramp-up cadence for this year. At what point though does the Gucci product reach critical mass in being in the new design concept? We're at 30% to 40% by the end of the year. Over what timeframe do we get to 80%, 90%? Are we talking the middle of next year, the end of next year or any other timeframe? Thank you.

And then finally, just, sorry, to come back to the margin guidance for the second half. Could I just clarify whether you're plus 100 to 150 basis points is a second half versus first half delta or a second half 2024 versus second half 2023 delta, year-on-year or half-on-half? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Piral. For me, I will start with your last question. Just for clarification, the 100 to 150 basis points is a sequential improvement H2 versus H1. Now going back to your first question on Gucci in China, in APAC and in China. Yes, China is the worst area of difficulty for Gucci at the moment, and probably all the weaknesses of the brand are exacerbated in China.

And it's true, in terms of perception of the brand and also in terms of the necessity, as I was mentioning, in raising the exclusivity of the distribution. So in terms of product, the product we talked about, the ramp-up of the new collection, the fact that we are going to add some – to rejuvenate part of the carryover lines, so we are working on it, and this is going to come in the next quarters.

Regarding the brand perception, as I said, there is a market moment, and maybe that's your first point. But we are working on it, and this is the plan that we already mentioned. While we are working on the retail experience in store that is very important, it's very important that we offer the best experience when customers are coming in stores. We are working on the quality of the products. We are working in the communication. I think you've seen that the ton of communication has changed over the last months. And of course, the aesthetic of Sabato is also bringing some exclusivity to the brand.

In terms of the plan, we have – we consider that we have the right setup. The team and the management team in China has welcomed some new additions. We have – there's been a lot of training of the Chinese sales assistance. After COVID and a lot of digital training, we are resuming physical training in-store, and we think it's extremely important.

And of course, all those actions, I'm mentioning the one on communication, also partnering with some local brand ambassador, we think it's very important to have local tone to the communication in China. Now those actions, it will take time. It will take some time to bear fruit, and we know it requires some patience.

Additionally, your last point on timing and the context. The context right now is not supportive because it is more polarized. Gucci, at the moment, is not in the sweet spot in terms of positioning, being perceived not enough high end or not enough affordable. But this context can change, and this can change rapidly.

Piral Dadhania

Thank you. And just – my middle question was just around the ramp-up of Sabato product and when it reaches critical mass in your opinion?

Claire Roblet

Hello, Piral, it's Claire. Yes. I mean full newness, we mentioned already, so you have the data for that. And newness, some of them are introduced to animate, I would say, existing lines like it's in-season novelties and don't have – will not become carryovers, and some are clearly introduced to become future carryover. So at some point, you will have novelties launched under Sabato's creative helm that will become carryover and help enrich and then rejuvenate the carryover base.

Now to be very clear, there are some lines that are iconic from Gucci that we will not obviously move from the assortment. We will continue to invest a lot on them in terms of communication. You have the Bamboo, you have the Jackie, you have the Horsebit. So on those one, we need to remain consistent. We have started to build, I would say, stronger image for those lines, and those will remain. I think that's the only additional granularity I can provide on carryover.

Piral Dadhania

Thank you.

Claire Roblet

Thank you.

Operator

The next question is from Carole Madjo of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Carole Madjo

Hi. Good evening. Just two questions for me, please. The first one to come back on the outlet as you mentioned. Have you already closed some outlets in Q1? And if so, in which regions? And just on that as well, can you come back on the economics of the outlet business? I expect them to be a bit more profitable than a regular store. Is it the case? And if so, should we expect then a bit more headwind on the margin going forward if you do cut them in the future months and year? That's the first question.

And the second one, a quick one actually on Valentino. So the brand has appointed Mr. Michele as the new designer. And of course, he left Gucci a few years ago. Can you maybe help us understand a bit more the rationale behind these appointments at the brand? Thank you.

Claire Roblet

Hello, Carole, it's Claire. I'll take those two ones. On Alessandro Michele rationale, no, I mean we are minority shareholders. So we will not go further into the explanation. We are very happy with this appointment, obviously. But it's not our goal as a minority shareholder to elaborate on the rationale.

About outlets, not yet in Q1. We mentioned that we needed outlet to manage also this inventory transition. So we can now not say that and then, at the same time, close outlet as soon as Q1. But we mentioned we will close outlet before the end of the year, and it'll be done across some different brands, starting obviously by Gucci. It will be done rather in – by the end of – I mean, in H2 might be Q4, end of Q3. I don't know exactly yet. So that's what I can mention. And in terms of location, they will be mostly located, if not only located in APAC/Japan.

Economies of outlet, I'm not sure it's a good call to do it. I'm happy to elaborate afterwards. I mean, it's productive stores, let's say it this way. Because even though you don't sell at the same level of price, you can have quite a decent if not good sales density.

And obviously, you don't have completely the same, I would say, retail experience, meaning it's not also the same level of rent. So yes, it can be a profitable business. And closing outlets can be, short-term, rather dilutive on the profitability, but that's – I mean that's no compromise on the strategy. We want to elevate the brand perception across-the-board, and that's part of the strategy.

I know there are still quite a lot of question in the queue and we already have 1 hour and 15 minutes of call. So maybe we can take one or two additional, and then we'll be happy to follow up afterwards.

Operator

The next question is from Charles-Louis Scotti of Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead.

Charles-Louis Scotti

Yes. Good evening. I will stick to two questions. One of your competitor sounded a bit more enthusiastic or, should I say, less pessimistic on the outlook of aspirational shoppers. Have you seen any signs that they could improve at some point during the rest of the year? Or is the business still fueled primarily by top spenders?

And my second question relates to your real estate strategy. Historically, you sold the majority stakes and lease back the building you purchased, which it seems to be no longer the case right now. Do you plan to keep the buildings you purchase on your balance sheet? And if yes, should we assume a significant increase in the cash net financial expenses this year? Thank you.

Claire Roblet

Okay. I'll start with the first one, Charles. More enthusiastic – I mean the only sign we are seeing in a few regions is that we start to see a slightly improving trends with younger customers compared to the recent quarter. So younger is aspirational. Is it exactly the same definition? Not always. But there is a bit of improvement there. Then at some point, yes, we will be more enthusiastic when we have more signs. If macro starts to improve, if inflation starts to moderate, if interest cuts starts to come, there will be obviously more reason to be optimistic. And that's clearly things that we can hope for in H2. I'll pass to Armelle for real estate.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you, Claire. On real estate, yes, you're right. You may remember that we invested a few years ago in a property in Tokyo in Omotesando based on such a scheme. We are currently working to proactively set up real estate vehicles with financial co-investors to reduce the weight of real estate assets on our balance sheet. Now for the moment – and we bought New York in the first quarter and the closing of Monte Napoleone will happen in H2. It will be financed by internal cash.

Charles-Louis Scotti

Thank you very much.

Claire Roblet

Thank you. I think we're going to take the last question, if you don't mind.

Operator

The last question comes from Rogerio Fujimori of Stifel. Please go ahead.

Rogerio Fujimori

Hi. Thanks for squeezing me in, Claire. I have a follow-up on Western Europe. I was hoping you could elaborate on Q1 trends in Western Europe. I think you said it was down 9% for the group, but talk about the sequential trends from local customers versus the growth you enjoyed from tourists. I've noticed that you had a huge divergence between plus 14% for BV to minus 16% for Gucci. So any additional color would be great. And then just a follow-up on Gucci in Asia. Have you seen any meaningful changes in Q1 versus Q4 in the other key markets in the region, like Korea, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, et cetera? Thank you.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you for your question. Regarding Western Europe trend, in Western Europe in Q1, the trend was roughly in line with Q4. Except Gucci, all the brands improved quarter-on-quarter: Saint Laurent, flat; BV at plus 14%; and Balenciaga, still negative but improving.

Tourist spending continue to normalize in Q1 as in Q4 2023. We saw: some normalization with Americans across-the-brand, except at BV; better trends with Middle Easterners with strong growth at BV and Saint Laurent, offset by more muted trends at Gucci; a strong double-digit growth of Chinese stories for all brands except Gucci; and as a whole, the weight of tourist in Western Europe, that was slightly below 50% in Q1. So of course, thanks to tourists, group level netted back to pre-pandemic level.

Local demand was still soft in Q1, but improved sequentially for all brands except Gucci. In terms of countries, maybe to mention that Italy displayed the best performance in Q1 as it was already the case in Q4.

Claire Roblet

And hello, Rogerio, maybe on the rest of Asia, I think – the main comment will relate to Korea, which is obviously the big part of rest of Asia, which, yes, did improve sequentially, which is – have a good news, the trends in Korea overall remain negative, but much less than before. We are aware it's easier comp base, too, because we start to anniversary the first heavy quarter, I would say, of decline in Korea. But yes, it starts to improve.

Rogerio Fujimori

Thank you very much.

Operator

Go ahead. There are no more questions.

Armelle Poulou

Thank you all for being on our call and for your questions. Our next reporting appointment will be on July 2024th, after the market close, for our first half results. In the meantime, we will, of course, pursue our dialogue. And as always, Claire and the Kering IR team will be available to answer the questions you still have. We wish you a nice evening.